Peer Review Quality and Editorial Decision Latency

Published article recordResearch ArticlesVolume 1 · Issue 12026

Peer Review Quality and Editorial Decision Latency

Jordan Okonkwo✉

Jordan OkonkwoSchool of Information, Example University

Abstract

This study examines associations between reviewer report completeness, revision rounds, and time-to-decision using a cohort of manuscripts processed under double-blind review. Implications for editorial office staffing are discussed.

Keywords

peer revieweditorial workflowdecision latency

Funding Statement

Supported by Example University Research Infrastructure Grant DEMO-2025.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Data / Code availability

Aggregated timing data are included as supplementary tables.

This public page is available only for published content. Post-publication notices, when issued, appear above the article body.